Chris James, Group Manager of Medsafe told in Court by an expert, "It is concerning that public health officials did not reveal this atypical feature of Comirnaty."
It is no wonder that the Government was so willing to take away our Human Rights during Covid, cos we were only considered on par with rats, not as human beings. If it was good enough for rats, it was good enough for us.
As mentioned in a previous comment of mine, my email correspondence with them clearly indicated a disconnect between the information Medsafe had (i.e. what the "sponsor" had provided) and what the Ministry of Health published on their website with respect to safety for pregnant and lactating women. Anyone reading what was published on the MOH website would conclude that the Ministry of Health had robust information upon which to base their message to pregnant and lactating women that the Pfizer product was perfectly safe and effective for them. Happy to share this email string with you TC.
As more information comes to light, the question of ‘informed consent’ becomes increasingly relevant.
The moment the vaccine was ‘approved’ by Medsafe the virus and the Pfizer product became politicised in a way previously unseen for any medication in New Zealand. Not only was the MOH completely committed to vaccination as the only valid response to the virus, but surprisingly, the Medical Council and the Royal New Zealand College of GPs became prescriptive about vaccination as the only permitted treatment for the virus. No mention of vitamin D, a healthy diet, regular sleep and exercise as being important in the maintenance of one’s health and immune system.
Any and all questions concerning the lack of long term safety data by GP’s were considered to be a breach of medical ethics, and GP’s who raised legitimate questions concerning safety, particularly for pregnant women were investigated under threat of de-registration.
How was it possible in this environment for the public to give informed consent if the concerns expressed by Medsafe were not in the public domain? If their GP’s were effectively silenced by the Medical Council? Thankfully there were some courageous GP’s who dared to step off the reservation and provide responsible council to their patients. For the most part they were rewarded with investigations and harassment.
Either way the public’s confidence in vaccines and the medical profession in general is at an all time low. A recent Rasmusson survey in the USA revealed that 10% of the public knows someone whom they believed died as a result of taking the mRNA Pfizer vaccine:
For your amusement in Stuff today: "General Practice New Zealand chairperson and Porirua general practitioner Dr Bryan Betty said getting both vaccines at the same time does not present any risks." Well, that's good to know!
This is the same Dr Betty made the following statement in a Stuff.co.nz article dated 10 June 2021:
“The Pfizer vaccine, being used in New Zealand, has already been administered to millions around the world with no more serious side effects than the flu vaccine.”
I pulled the comparative vaccine injury data out of Medsafe. Turns out you are 36 x more likely to be seriously injured with the Pfizer product. I made a formal complaint to the Medical Council about Dr Betty's 'disinformation' as they were actively investigating 17 doctors at the time, but they dismissed my complaint. Disinformation only flows one way apparently.
Logically I find it almost “inconceivable” that a doctor could -- having been trained under the “first do no harm” mantra and having seen the age stratification of Covid deaths and the fact the trials did not cover pregnant women -- recommend the vaccine to a pregnant woman (or possibly even a woman of child bearing age full stop). But here we are with the medical council giving chilling directives as well as going after a doctor somewhere who recommended against pregnant/child bearing age women getting the jab (as well as effectively banning ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine).
The rot starts at the head, but generally it would seem most doctors were sequacious believers. I have three friends who are doctors, they all believe the (6/7 mice) bivalent booster is a good idea, non of them are curious about excess deaths happening all over the world.
I like many have lost faith in every layer of the medicine/vaccine/pharma/regulatory complex.
"However, it is not clear from Dr [X]’s affidavit why he considers that is cause for concern. This study does not show that the mRNA component (the vaccine) follows the same distribution pattern. Dr [X] also does not explain why it could be concerning for mRNA to spread in the body.”
The whole point of safety studies in a completely novel therapeutic is to show that is safe. Saying "we don't know it's dangerous" is not the same as saying something is safe.
This is even more important when the risk reduction from the therapeutic is vanishingly small in most people.
But by this stage responses like this are wearingly familiar.
It is no wonder that the Government was so willing to take away our Human Rights during Covid, cos we were only considered on par with rats, not as human beings. If it was good enough for rats, it was good enough for us.
As mentioned in a previous comment of mine, my email correspondence with them clearly indicated a disconnect between the information Medsafe had (i.e. what the "sponsor" had provided) and what the Ministry of Health published on their website with respect to safety for pregnant and lactating women. Anyone reading what was published on the MOH website would conclude that the Ministry of Health had robust information upon which to base their message to pregnant and lactating women that the Pfizer product was perfectly safe and effective for them. Happy to share this email string with you TC.
Thanks Trish. Yes, very interested to see the chain.
How can I get this to you?
I’m at cranmer@substack.com
As more information comes to light, the question of ‘informed consent’ becomes increasingly relevant.
The moment the vaccine was ‘approved’ by Medsafe the virus and the Pfizer product became politicised in a way previously unseen for any medication in New Zealand. Not only was the MOH completely committed to vaccination as the only valid response to the virus, but surprisingly, the Medical Council and the Royal New Zealand College of GPs became prescriptive about vaccination as the only permitted treatment for the virus. No mention of vitamin D, a healthy diet, regular sleep and exercise as being important in the maintenance of one’s health and immune system.
Any and all questions concerning the lack of long term safety data by GP’s were considered to be a breach of medical ethics, and GP’s who raised legitimate questions concerning safety, particularly for pregnant women were investigated under threat of de-registration.
How was it possible in this environment for the public to give informed consent if the concerns expressed by Medsafe were not in the public domain? If their GP’s were effectively silenced by the Medical Council? Thankfully there were some courageous GP’s who dared to step off the reservation and provide responsible council to their patients. For the most part they were rewarded with investigations and harassment.
Either way the public’s confidence in vaccines and the medical profession in general is at an all time low. A recent Rasmusson survey in the USA revealed that 10% of the public knows someone whom they believed died as a result of taking the mRNA Pfizer vaccine:
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/covid_19_virus_deaths_vs_vaccine_deaths
I expect the New Zealand experience would be similar.
For your amusement in Stuff today: "General Practice New Zealand chairperson and Porirua general practitioner Dr Bryan Betty said getting both vaccines at the same time does not present any risks." Well, that's good to know!
This is the same Dr Betty made the following statement in a Stuff.co.nz article dated 10 June 2021:
“The Pfizer vaccine, being used in New Zealand, has already been administered to millions around the world with no more serious side effects than the flu vaccine.”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/125386042/nzs-covidfree-status-relies-on-trust-in-the-vaccine
I pulled the comparative vaccine injury data out of Medsafe. Turns out you are 36 x more likely to be seriously injured with the Pfizer product. I made a formal complaint to the Medical Council about Dr Betty's 'disinformation' as they were actively investigating 17 doctors at the time, but they dismissed my complaint. Disinformation only flows one way apparently.
Logically I find it almost “inconceivable” that a doctor could -- having been trained under the “first do no harm” mantra and having seen the age stratification of Covid deaths and the fact the trials did not cover pregnant women -- recommend the vaccine to a pregnant woman (or possibly even a woman of child bearing age full stop). But here we are with the medical council giving chilling directives as well as going after a doctor somewhere who recommended against pregnant/child bearing age women getting the jab (as well as effectively banning ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine).
The rot starts at the head, but generally it would seem most doctors were sequacious believers. I have three friends who are doctors, they all believe the (6/7 mice) bivalent booster is a good idea, non of them are curious about excess deaths happening all over the world.
I like many have lost faith in every layer of the medicine/vaccine/pharma/regulatory complex.
"However, it is not clear from Dr [X]’s affidavit why he considers that is cause for concern. This study does not show that the mRNA component (the vaccine) follows the same distribution pattern. Dr [X] also does not explain why it could be concerning for mRNA to spread in the body.”
The whole point of safety studies in a completely novel therapeutic is to show that is safe. Saying "we don't know it's dangerous" is not the same as saying something is safe.
This is even more important when the risk reduction from the therapeutic is vanishingly small in most people.
But by this stage responses like this are wearingly familiar.
That you for this. I saw Dr John Campbell showing us how the TGA had lied to us.